Tables sorting numeric values
sorting of columns in tables is not efficient.
-
for venn: It treats pos and neg values as not continuous values (in increasing sorting, smallest is 0, not -5 for ex).
-
for general table (top table): an issue for E
** Ex. of sorting ascending on logFC in summary table:
| ProbeName | GeneName | logFC_PparaWT_Pema-PparaWT_Ctrl |
|---|---|---|
| A_51_P106799 | Pparg | 1.42e-01 |
| A_55_P2055854 | Ppara | 1.91e-01 |
| A_55_P2071596 | Ppara | 4.20e-01 |
| A_65_P02810 | Ppargc1b | -1.04e-01 |
| A_51_P279038 | Ppargc1a | -1.20e-01 |
| A_55_P2745394 | Ppargc1a | -1.22e-01 |
| A_51_P294891 | Ppargc1b | -3.11e-01 |
| A_66_P124715 | Ppard | -3.38e-01 |
** exemple on descending mode:
| ProbeName | GeneName | logFC_PparaWT_Pema-PparaWT_Ctrl |
|---|---|---|
| A_66_P124715 | Ppard | -3.38e-01 |
| A_51_P294891 | Ppargc1b | -3.11e-01 |
| A_55_P2745394 | Ppargc1a | -1.22e-01 |
| A_51_P279038 | Ppargc1a | -1.20e-01 |
| A_65_P02810 | Ppargc1b | -1.04e-01 |
| A_55_P2071596 | Ppara | 4.20e-01 |
| A_55_P2055854 | Ppara | 1.91e-01 |
| A_51_P106799 | Pparg | 1.42e-01 |