Currently, all the functions are exported to facilitate development. Thus, they are listed in the manual. However, it is not relevant to do so, especially for the `plot*()` functions. In addition, I am not sure that it is relevant to create `plot` S3 methods for `HN`, `RR` and `TA` objects just to manage the type of plot. Maybe it could be managed inside the `plot.ts_meteo()` function. It could simplify the readability of the index of the package functions for the user. Especially since the user never consciously manipulates these objects. Maybe it is enough to keep only `plot.ts_hydro()` and `plot.ts_meteo()`. Maybe it could be the same for the `regime` S3 methods. I don't know if we should split the 'hydro' and 'meteo' functions. I think that it more readable and easier to manage, but the code and documentation are sometimes a bit redundant. The 'meta()` function is not currently splited `metats_hydro()` and `meta.ts_meteo()`. By the way, it would be possible to detect automatically if it is a hydrological or meteorological feature by checking the feature code: ```r # hydro grepl("^\\d", "Y1234567") [1] FALSE # meteo grepl("^\\d", "12345678") [1] TRUE ```